Back in
August of last year, my then recently ex wife asked how I was doing and if I
was eating ok.
The answer?
Well, I was, I think, eating all right – I was consuming food anyway – but I
constantly wondered why. Why was I eating at all? Food sustains life, but if
you feel like you have none, what’s the point? That question - what’s the
point? – was my principal enemy.
Other such
Negative Automatic Thoughts (NATs) have plagued me in the past – and certain
ones still do (there have been times I could swear the words NOT GOOD ENOUGH
were tattooed on my brain at an early age), although I am generally much more
aware of them and practised at catching them before they can flit around my
head too long and make a major fucking pest of themselves.
But ‘what’s
the point?’ is a particularly stubborn one to swat.
It’s
returned today, just as I sat down to write this blog. But it’s not born of any
questioning the worth of this exercise. Which is probably one reason why I’m
still ploughing ahead and writing it. That, and I can be a stubborn bastard
too.
Fortunately,
I’ve progressed a long way since last August. Remembering that time serves as a
helpful reminder of how far I’ve come. Of course, the days when these
breakdowns still threaten serve as a counter-reminder of how fragile sometimes
recovery can be.
Today’s blog
post can be viewed as something of a test, then. How will I fare in confronting
and handling this mini crisis point? Will the NAT win today? Or will I spray it
with positive insecticide and watch it emulate a dying fly on the windowsill of
February?
Where’d this
NAT come from?
Well, NATs
hover around all kinds of shit, but I remember this particular one from back in
the middle of this month.
There I was
still working away to get caught up after that first fortnight in January and I
was doing pretty well, I reckoned. (At current estimate, one more month of
playing catch up should get me back on the original schedule, yay!) Then
someone kicked my sandcastle. Twas those nasty folks at the Inland Revenue.
Mind, they were just following orders. Changes in the rules for Working Tax
Credits, handed down from their Tory scumbag masters.
Briefly, in
future, £54 per week of WTC will be dependent on my ability to show a profit in
my chosen self-employment. This will require quarterly reporting, interviews,
assessments etc. Because, obviously, the pressures of making a living out of writing
weren’t enough already.
Now, I’m
guessing, but maybe when normal, healthy people read these kind of official
notification letter from government they grumble, bitch, moan, probably swear a
bit. For me, it provoked huge anger, anxiety attacks, reduced me to tears, made
me contemplate jacking it all in and question the worth of life. In short, resurrected
that old NAT to come haunt me again.
What’s the
point?
(Honestly,
my heart goes out to those more vulnerable than myself who may identify with
some of the above, but are finding themselves under greater pressures and
suffering greater hardships.)
Battled
through it and fought it off over the course of a day, which is to my credit. A
case of being good to myself, giving myself a day off work (that’ll help prove
my profitability), lots of music, modest amounts of creativity (I find artwork
therapeutic – I’m no good at it, but oddly that means I don’t end up beating
myself up about the quality – or lack of it – the way I would with a shoddy
piece of writing). A combination, I suppose, of fighting the thought at the
moments I was feeling strong and diverting myself from it when I wasn’t feeling
up to the fight.
That spell
aside, most of February has been productive and creative. I’ve been working hard
on a number of projects, enjoyed a lovely little morale boost just by virtue of
officially announcing one of those projects (a novel for the Lethbridge-Stewart
range, by Candy Jar books – that’s right, me writing for the dear old Brigadier
from Doctor Who), and achieving all manner of stuff that wouldn’t impress the
Inland Revenue one jot.
(NB. All
these efforts of mine may actually generate income at some point, but I’m just
not sure hard graft and productivity will weigh heavily as evidence to present
before officialdom. Time will tell.)
Wary of the
power that added pressure had to sink me – even if ‘only’ for a day (and I put
‘only’ in quotes because it really was a horrible day) – I looked to be a bit
more prepared for future torpedo attacks – because we all know there will be
more. There are always more.
So I did an
exercise in what we’ll call life accounting. Essentially, listing goals – the
elements you’re missing or seeking in life, the ‘things’ you want (quotes
because most of the things I want aren’t things) – and your principal enemies –
the negatives, the qualities or habits, say, that hold you back, barriers or
opposition etc – in Column B. Example: mine are largely internal – depression,
obviously, stress, anxiety, anger, loneliness, tiredness.
See, I don’t
even include the Inland Revenue, they don’t feature because although they have
added to my pressures – thanks, guys – they are not the problem. My problem
lies in how I deal with them. Indeed, I made a conscious effort to exclude
anything that wasn’t dependent solely on me. Because anything you are trying to
address or achieve in life that is reliant on someone else is open to huge
amounts of uncertainty. And this, we don’t need. Not when we’re focused on our
own recovery.
Anyway, in
other columns, you then start to list your actions. The steps you might take to
attain those items in Column A and the steps you might take to eliminate,
reduce or overcome those in Column B. Broad strokes, at first, but it helps if
you can then go on to break the broader steps down into smaller, more
immediately manageable actions. Baby steps.
(As I said
on Facebook, columns – they’re s supporting structure.)
No need to
bore you with my entire spreadsheet, but it’s worth citing a specific example,
particularly one where I know it’s helped and I’ve made measurable progress. If
tiredness is an Enemy and physical fitness/health a goal, one response is
physical exercise – I resumed my (old) habit of a morning swim. Just once a
week for now, since that’s all the budget will allow for, but it’s a start.
That, as it
happened, had additional side benefits. I felt good about myself just for doing
it. Yeah, it took me until the last week of the month to apply this plan, but
hey, I did it. Medal, please. Pat on the back. Muchos congrats.
And if my
subconscious throws up that NAT – what’s the point? – about that, well, I can
point specifically at the point. The point in this case, oh nuisance NAT, is
physical health, feeling fitter (eventually!) and feeling generally better
about myself (heck, feeling more attractive maybe – why the hell not) and
possibly feeling sufficiently knackered for at least one day a week so that I
actually sleep pretty well. Thanks for asking, NAT.
And if you
have an answer for the NAT, there’s not much for it to do but sod off. For a
while anyway.
Writing this
has gone some significant way to answering today’s NAT. Hopefully it’s beating
its head against a window somewhere in this café in its efforts to get out and
leave me alone.
For the
duration of March, at least. Because I have every intention of being too
fucking busy to deal with NATs. And the action to take in the face of Inland
Revenue letters of doom is to stick with the plan. It was a good plan. And it’s
still a good plan. We have to trust in that.
In the
months since that dark August I have battled to find raisons d’être and I
believe I succeeded. Now I think I’m ready to start looking for raisons de
vivre.
SAF 2016